A New York appeals court judge on Friday signed off on the appointment of a neutral expert to prepare new congressional district lines that could be used if the state’s highest court upholds a lower-court ruling that struck down maps drawn by Democratic lawmakers.
The judge, Justice Stephen K. Lindley of the Fourth Appellate Department, emphasized in his decision that the substitute maps would only be a backup measure meant to preserve a range of possible remedies as the courts consider a broader legal challenge to the maps brought by Republicans .
But Justice Lindley’s directive raised the specter that an increasingly tangled fight over New York’s freshly drawn congressional districts could still veer away from Democrats months after they enacted a map that favors their candidates in 22 of 26 districts, and require the state to delay this year’s primary. contests from June until August.
The political stakes are high: With the two parties locked in a national battle for control of the House, the swing of just a few seats in New York could theoretically be the difference between a Democratic or Republican majority in Washington next year.
So far, only one trial court judge – a Republican from rural Steuben County – has weighed in on the case. The judge, Patrick F. McAllister, struck down all of the state’s legislative districts last week as a violation of a 2014 state constitutional amendment that outlawed partisan gerrymandering. He ordered lawmakers to redraw the lines with bipartisan support or hand the process over to a special master.
What to Know About Redistricting
Democrats appealed the decision and they believe they will prevail at either the Appellate Division or at the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court. They argue that the maps’ partisan tilt reflects the makeup of a heavily Democratic state like New York, not an attempt to skew the lines for partisan advantage.
Justice Lindley provided for that possibility, too. Even as he gave Justice McAllister approval to appoint a special master to create “standby” maps, Justice Lindley opted to keep in place a stay on most of the lower-court ruling, effectively allowing the election to proceed under the current district maps for now .
“The stay will, among other things, allow candidates for Congress, State Senate and Assembly to file designating petitions by the statutory deadline, and allow the boards of elections to accept such petitions,” he wrote.
If the courts ultimately find that the maps are consistent with the State Constitution, the primaries would proceed as planned in June. If the maps are struck down, the courts would have to decide whether to delay the primaries and order replacement maps, or allow this year’s contests to go forward as scheduled using the Democratic lines and wait until the next election cycle – or schedule special elections – to fix them.
A final decision is expected around the end of April.
Allowing a special master to begin working on backup lines now may increase the chances that the courts could lock in place replacement maps before this year’s elections if they rule against Democrats. The Legislature would almost certainly be given an opportunity by the court to correct them first.
How US Redistricting Works
What is redistricting? It’s the redrawing of the boundaries of congressional and state legislative districts. It happens every 10 years, after the census, to reflect changes in population.
Michael Li, senior counsel for the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, called Justice Lindley’s order a “logical step.”
“Too often, map drawing gets put completely on hold and then by the time a case is decided, there is not enough time to redraw maps,” Mr. Li said. “But that does not mean the situation is not messy for lawmakers and even more so for people running for office.”
A court-appointed special master drew New York’s congressional lines in 2012 during the last redistricting cycle. In that case, a federal court took over the process because the State Senate and Assembly – which were then controlled by Republicans and Democrats, respectively – simply could not agree enough to approve any House district lines.
Democratic lawyers had argued at a hearing on Thursday against appointing a special master this year before a final decision is reached. Lawyers for the plaintiffs, New York voters supported by national Republican groups, took the opposite position.
On Friday, both parties seemed happy with Judge Lindley’s decision. Mike Murphy, a spokesman for the Senate Democrats, did not say whether lawmakers would consider drafting new maps before a final ruling, as Justice Lindley had urged them to do so.
“We are pleased the stay is continued, allowing the election to move forward, and we look forward to being heard on appeal in the next couple of weeks,” he said in a statement.